With the politics of the day talking about Nationalizing and BREXIT, it's important to point out some key UN treaties that exist. Everyone wants to "pull out", until you realize what "pulling out" really looks like. One treaty being the Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques . The US State Dept documents this treaty, but it's important to note in the documents, that it says nothing of using these techniques on it's own citizens. The same time the treaty was signed, Congress also made it mandatory to report all the weather modifications operating on US soil in an annual report . They held committee's in 08 on aersol injections for solar radiation management as well. The study and research into modifying the weather and climate is still ongoing   . These tools are also de-classified in a FOIA request from the CIA here . Are we so sure drones on US soil are just being used to monitor us or to report on other issues relating to a future event... because in  Border and Customs reports how often they use drones on our soil, but they also interestingly enough document how many times joint exercises were stalled because of weather related events.
Think about the implications here. We have "official" documents that weather can be used as a weapon... but the only thing holding us back from using it as such, is a treaty. And now with an "official" report from the border patrol that "weather" hampers monitoring... the only possible conclusion is get the public behind a push to end some treaties. If they can convince to you support leaving a nuclear treaty, they sure as can get you to abandon the weather modification treaty. ((of which is still ongoing in what's called Benign Weather Modification  PDF and reported to NOAA ))
THE YEAR IS 2025
5 years after the installation of the Space Force , 5 years prior to the UN Sustainable Development plans ((also in )), and the USAF commissions a study on what they would look like going into the future . Interestingly enough, documented the same year Congress was holding hearings on SRM . This is where we get the think tank documentation from Col Tamzy J. House on Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025 . It wasn't just that, but a whole host of other documents. The USAF was wanting to see what could be done using the public as a tool. This is what they say after the findings and think tanks turned in their reports - READ THIS REAL SLOWLY -
If the forecasters are right, the Air Force in 2025 will be significantly different from that of today, despite the fact that most of the systems on which USAF will depend decades from now are already in service or development.
We don't need to wait until 2025, they're already using weather as a weapon, and admit it in this publication . DID YOU KNOW that the USAF actually has an agency called Air Force Weather Agency?? The agency's main site , found in researching AF2025 in this PDF . All the documentation one needs without screams of HAARP or anything else out there that comes up first on the topic when you research this.
Back to the UN treaty on using weather as a weapon . Want to know what countries that never ratified this???
The Holy See
Notice any of these being interesting to geo-politics
Are we so sure that our innovations are not being sold to Saudi or Israel. Technically these techniques are considered weapons according to the treaty. Selling weapons to the Saudi / Israeli military takes on a whole new meaning now doesn't it??? Russia selling "weapons" to Iran???
 PDF https://media.defense.gov/2017/Dec/28/2001861722/-1/-1/0/T_COBLE_BENIGN_WEATHER_MODIFICATION.PDF
 PDF https://archive.org/stream/WeatherAsAForceMultiplier/WeatherAsAForceMultiplier_djvu.txt